Groups Targeted by I.R.S. Tested Rules on Politics – NYT

Nonprofit Applicants Chafing at I.R.S. Tested Political Limits – NYTimes.com

The Wetumpka Tea Party, from Alabama, sponsored training for a get-out-the-vote initiative dedicated to the “defeat of President Barack Obama” while the I.R.S. was weighing its application.

And the head of the Ohio Liberty Coalition, whose application languished with the I.R.S. for more than two years, sent out e-mails to members about Mitt Romney campaign events and organized members to distribute Mr. Romney’s presidential campaign literature.

Representatives of these organizations have cried foul in recent weeks about their treatment by the I.R.S., saying they were among dozens of conservative groups unfairly targeted by the agency, harassed with inappropriate questionnaires and put off for months or years as the agency delayed decisions on their applications.

But a close examination of these groups and others reveals an array of election activities that tax experts and former I.R.S. officials said would provide a legitimate basis for flagging them for closer review.

 

Ignorance is freedom – The economist

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2013/04/national-science-foundation-funding

“THE most urgent research priority for American social science is the question of why so many congresspeople are boastful ignoramuses. But since Tom Coburn, the Republican senator from Oklahoma, succeeded in blocking National Science Foundation funding for political science last month (“except for research projects that the [NSF director] certifies aspromoting national security or the economic interests of the United States”), this critical research subject will have a hard time getting a grant. Now, not content with having saved American taxpayers 1/12th of the cost of an F-35 fighter by defunding political-science research, our elected representatives are seeking to eliminate yet more wasteful spendingon useless stuff like intellectual inquiry.”

When a million isn’t enough: why top bankers are struggling to get by

http://news.efinancialcareers.com/uk-en/140070/when-a-million-isnt-enough-why-top-bankers-are-struggling-to-get-by/

“In theory, a seven figure annual pay packet should be more than enough to live on. In the UK, only the top 1% of income taxpayers earn anything more than £150k according to figures from the Office of National Statistics. In the US, the top 1% of people earn more than $370k according to the Internal Revenue Service.  And yet, some bankers in the top bracket are having money troubles.

“It’s really not that unusual to find Wall Street bankers who are close to declaring themselves bankrupt,” said Gary Goldstein, co-founder of U.S. search firm Whitney Partners. “Some people are really struggling.”

“You get a lot of people who have a very expensive lifestyle,” said Louise Cooper, a former Goldman Sachs salesperson and financial analyst at Cooper City. “They will always have a nanny, private schools for the children and they will have a very big expensive house. All of this has to be paid for out of taxable income,” she points out. “With a top tax rate of 45%, this means that you need to be earning nearly double what you’re spending.”

Let’s consider the word entitlement for a moment…

A note to the Tea Party…

If you want to stop speculation about right wing extremism and militants, how about you talk to your own people and tell them to stop wearing shirts and continuously saying that “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

Here’s a news flash –  Obama is NOT a tyrant and Thomas Jefferson did not intend that quote to be abused by a minority with an agenda tied to the past.

Jefferson saw our constitution as a flexible thing to be re-shaped by future generations to fit their needs:

http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/index.asp?document=459

Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the arc of the covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human, and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment. I knew that age well; I belonged to it, and labored with it. It deserved well of its country. It was very like the present, but without the experience of the present; and forty years of experience in government is worth a century of book-reading; and this they would say themselves, were they to rise from the dead. I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions. I think moderate imperfections had better be borne with; because, when once known, we accommodate ourselves to them, and find practical means of correcting their ill effects. But I know also, that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors.

 

Is this missing Brown U student Boston bomber suspect number 2? – Answer: No

It seems the crowdsourcing folks on redit may be on to something.

While reviewing photos of the suspected Boston bombers someone noticed a similarity between suspect number 2 and a missing Brown University student by the name of Sunil Tripathi. Tripathi went missing March 16th after leaving home without his phone or wallet wearing a black jacket and jeans. His disappearance came one day after a second unexplained explosion in nearby Hanover. The explosions could possibly have been tests for the bombs used at the Marathon. Samples of the devices were found and classified as M-1000 home made flash powder bombs as seen in this video. Note the white smoke  from the detonation.

I want to caution people that all of this may well be coincidence. I have no more information than is available on the internet. But I am happy to say that it appears this information has already been passed on to the FBI.

EDIT: It turns out that this was a false lead that spread across the internet. Apologies to the family of Sunil. Let’s all pray that he is found safe and returned to the family that loves him.

Shocking Paper Claims That Microsoft Excel Coding Error Is Behind The Reinhart-Rogoff Study On Debt

Read more: http://www.nextnewdeal.net/researchers-finally-replicated-reinhart-rogoff-and-there-are-serious-problems#ixzz2QkFWFptz

In 2010, economists Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff released a paper, “Growth in a Time of Debt.” Their “main result is that…median growth rates for countries with public debt over 90 percent of GDP are roughly one percent lower than otherwise; average (mean) growth rates are several percent lower.” Countries with debt-to-GDP ratios above 90 percent have a slightly negative average growth rate, in fact.

This has been one of the most cited stats in the public debate during the Great Recession. Paul Ryan‘s Path to Prosperity budget states their study “found conclusive empirical evidence that [debt] exceeding 90 percent of the economy has a significant negative effect on economic growth.” The Washington Post editorial board takes it as an economic consensus view, stating that ”debt-to-GDP could keep rising — and stick dangerously near the 90 percent mark that economists regard as a threat to sustainable economic growth.” 

What are the chances that Paul Ryan will re-think his position based on this new information?  Somehow I don’t see it happening.

Obama Proposal To Sell TVA Blasted By Republicans

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/obama-tva_n_3090958.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003

WASHINGTON — In a political role reversal, Republicans are blasting President Barack Obama’s plan to consider selling the Tennessee Valley Authority, an icon of the New Deal long targeted by conservatives as an example of government overreach.

Obama’s 2014 budget proposal calls for a strategic review of the TVA, the nation’s largest public utility with 9 million customers in seven states from Virginia to Mississippi.

Selling the U.S-owned power company could reduce the federal deficit by at least $25 billion and “help put the nation on a sustainable fiscal path,” Obama says in a budget document.

Not so fast, say GOP lawmakers in the region.

“It’s one more bad idea in a budget full of bad ideas,” said Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., a longtime TVA champion.

“There is no assurance that selling TVA to a profit-making entity would reduce electric bills in the Tennessee Valley, and it could lead to higher electricity rates” for customers in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia, Alexander said.

 

Wait… So the “Socialist” president suggests privatizing the TVA and a republican is saying that capitalism “could lead to higher electricity rates”.  At this point It should be clear that republicans are more concerned about opposing Obama than anything else.

 

A few thoughts on the Boston bombing.

It’s not yet been 24 hours and we have no answers yet as to who committed this horrible act or why. The one thing any sane person should know is that there is nothing that can justify such an evil act. There is no injustice, real or perceived that makes such an act acceptable in a civilized world. May those who were affected find peace and may those who committed this act be found and brought to justice.

A few thoughts on gun control.

This is a subject that I have held back on for fear of making it the defining issue of this site. But I think a few words are in order here.

Very few things today are as polarizing as the issue of gun control. Extremist nut jobs on the right like Mike Huckabee would have you believe that the “gubment” is out to get all of your guns to create a Nazi like dictatorship by requiring universal background checks and stricter control of gun sales in shows and by individuals. Of course it’s all bullshit. Hitler actually relaxed gun control laws for political favorites. People such as Nazi party members were exempt from any restrictions while jews and other persecuted classes were barred from any gun ownership whatsoever. A fact that says more about a party system’s tendency to create conflict, leading one side to demonize the other. And what extremists do with ultimate power than the effects of gun control. The reality is that some gun control makes sense, some doesn’t. And if gun advocates want to keep their fundamental right to keep and bear arms, as a society we need responsible rules for the purchase, storage, and re-sale of firearms. The NRA’s position of  no compromise is as irresponsible as it is foolish.

That’s not to say I don’t take issue with many proposals from the left. With a population of over 300 million people and some 3 to 6 million “assault style” weapons in the hands of law abiding citizens there were 323 murders by rifles of  any type. And while good numbers are hard to come by, common sense will tell you that a good number of those murders were committed with weapons not in consideration of a ban. Mr. Obama has stated that if we can save one life with an assault weapons ban or a ban on “high capacity” magazines it’s worth it. But while I’m all for saving one life, I would much rather focus our political will on solutions that will save the most lives with the least impact on law abiding citizens. And I’m sorry Mr. Biden, but your ridiculous suggestion for the use of a shotgun as an alternative to an AR15 is monumentally stupid.

None of this is to suggest that we can’t put some restrictions on the sale and purchase of “assault style weapons such as the AR15. Perhaps as a new class of weapon below class 3 but more restricted than standard hunting rifles. (although tighter background checks for all weapons might make this un-necessary) They should probably also be banned from sale by multi-product stores such as Walmart and restricted to sales by certified gun dealers. As anyone with any experience in marketing knows, the more a product is seen by the general public, the more that product sells. And while I support the ownership of such weapons, I don’t believe we should encourage their sale as an impulse item.

I try to imagine a workable set of rules for ammunition capacity but the best I can come up with is a ten round limit (this is the new average for “low” capacity mags) with 30 round mags classified as Class 3. But that would require a massive retrofit of hundreds of millions of magazines “in the wild” now. And such a move would be completely un-enforceable except retroactively should someone be caught with a banned capacity mag. If you want to ban “high capacity mags, start with 50 and 100 rounds. Those are the true high capacity magazines. And I just don’t buy the argument that restricting magazine capacity to 10 rounds will save many lives. The nature of a gun magazine is that they can be changed *very* rapidly, negating the impact of enforcing lower capacity mags.

The bulk of changes and IMO the most effective still comes down to tighter background checks and tough laws for the storage and availability of weapons, along with greater availability of mental health services for those families who cannot afford them now.

I would also call on the NRA to provide better training and information as a way to avoid much stricter rules and regulations. From my experience taking an “approved” NRA handgun safety class, I believe they can do a lot more to stress safe storage, responsible use, and restriction of access by people who may have mental health issues within a gun owning household (a subject that is not currently covered at all). The NRA needs to put more emphasis on the kind of gun education and training that will reduce senseless firearm deaths and less on demonizing the president for listening to American citizens who are demanding better gun control.

The bottom line is that if we want to save lives AND protect our liberties, lets find a compromise that we can all live with.

The Biggest Cyber Attack In History Is Taking Place Right Now – businessinsider.com

Spamhaus Cyberbunker DDOS Attack – Business Insider

“A Dutch web host called Cyberbunker states that it will host anything except child pornography or terrorism-related content. Spamhaus blocked Cyberbunker’s servers in an effort to weed out any spammers that might host their content with the company.

Now Spamhaus is alleging that Cyberbunker is collaborating with a Russian and Eastern European criminal organizations to facilitate the attacks.”

Wait, you mean a spam hosting company is behind it. We know who they are and have a physical location for the servers… Where are the drone strikes when you need them?

 

Update: Turns out the whole story was overblown. I’m still hoping for a drone strike on Cyberbunker.

That Internet War Apocalypse Is a Lie

Post Navigation